Justification:

By Faith Alone?

A Theology Internet Debate

between

Eric Ewanco

eje@world.std.com

and

Andrew Webb

ajwebb@pop.erols.com

Wednesday, April 10th to Tuesday, April 16th

Mirrored at http://www.cybercom.net/~eje/justification.html


0. Logistics

This two-person debate is transmitted over the Internet in both electronic mail form and HTML form available via web browsers. If you are receiving this via electronic mail, you are on the auditor distribution list. To remove yourself or add yourself to the email distribution list, send email to eje@world.std.com. This is a human, not an autoresponder, and the debate is not a mailing list, discussion list, or listserv, but a private, manual distribution list for the purpose of publishing the proceedings of the debate. Anyone can read the HTML version on the web without subscribing; the HTML version has some formatting and hyperlinks which the email version does not.

Readers may be interested in using the online WWW Bible Gateway, http://www.gospelcom.net/bible, for checking Scripture references across several different translations and for doing Bible searches.

1. Introduction

The theological issue of justification was the cause of the 16th Century Reformation which caused the division between the Catholic Church and the Reformed, or Protestant, Churches. The pioneers of the Reformation were Martin Luther and John Calvin.

The Reformers argued, on the basis of Scripture alone ("sola scriptura") that we are justified by "faith alone" ("sola fide").

The question of this debate today is whether in fact, on the basis of Scripture alone, we may say that we are justified by faith alone.

The affirmative side is argued by Mr. Webb, a Reformed Christian. The negative side is argued by Mr. Ewanco, a Catholic Christian. The basis for proof will be the inspired, inerrant, and infallible Holy Scriptures according to the shorter Reformed canon.

2. Format

The format of the debate will not be a strict one. We have seven days in which to make our points and draw our conclusions, alternating back and forth between Mr. Webb and Mr. Ewanco. Naturally all will be done in Christian charity, that is, agape love!

Please note that this is not a discussion open to audience participation; those on the distribution list are auditors. We unfortunately do not have the resources at this time to dedicate a public discussion forum for this topic. However auditors are welcome to ask questions privately to the debaters over email.

We will begin with some personal introductions.

3. Preliminary Disclaimers

Both Mr. Webb and Mr. Ewanco officially represent only themselves acting as private Christian believers, and do not speak authoritatively for any church, organization, or employer. Nothing in this debate should be construed as representing the opinion of their employers or Internet service providers. Mr. Ewanco will present an argument which to the best of his knowledge and ability is in complete conformance to orthodox Catholic Christian teaching, but as an amateur layman he has no ecclesiastical teaching authority.

Mr. Webb will present an argument which he believes conforms to the essentials of the historic Christian faith as taught by scripture. He too, is a layman and cannot claim to be in any way authoritative.

4. Hypertext Proceedings of Debate

Below is a list of exchanges in the debate. Links lacking hypertext sensitivity (i.e. not "clickable") have not yet been published.

Biographical Introductions (10 April 1996)

Andrew Webb / Eric Ewanco

Round 1 (10 April 1996)

Andrew Webb / Eric Ewanco

Round 2 (12-13 April 1996)

Andrew Webb / Eric Ewanco

Round 3 (14-15 April 1996)

Andrew Webb (Part 1/1) / Eric Ewanco

Last updated 16 April 1996, 12am by

eje@world.std.com